I saw an email this week that claimed that over 70 members of Congress are self-proclaimed Socialists and members of the Socialist Party’s main organization in America. (It’s attached below and I’m going to make a bigger claim – Progressivism IS Socialism and I can prove it) So let’s look at this for a moment.
Regarding the claim that many members of congress are Socialists, I checked and on the Democratic Socialists of America website and there really are many dues-paying congress-people. Sen. Joe McCarthy must be saying “I told you so” in his grave. As an aside, the next time I call Barack Obama a Socialist, I don’t want to hear ANYONE saying I’m being unfair – he has described HIMSELF as such and proven it with his (prior) membership and accepting the backing of the leading organization that espouses his viewpoint. The fact that he deflects the question now is just proof of his total lack of integrity – man-up for crying out loud and OWN it, Mr. President. That’s why we call you the Manchurian Candidate – because of your constant refusal to be truthful about what you believe and what you stand for.
So once we get past the terminology and the affiliation – the real question is this: Is America a Socialist nation? Do we want it to become one? Is it allowable for those who want it to become one to change the very fabric of the nation (and our Constitution) to make it so and to do that against the will of those who do not? Is it a “majority rule” choice? Can it be done by Presidential fiat (saying it’s so) or by just ignoring the Constitution which has clear rules in how it must be changed?
Lest you continue to doubt the relevance, let’s move on to my claim that Progressivism IS Socialism. Let’s compare the promises of the Progressive Caucus with the stated goals on the Democratic Socialist website Here are the web sites for the Socialist Party and the Congressional Progressive Caucus – compare the two, they are virtually the same – and yes, that really is the same Grijalva who is from Arizona and wants to have no enforcement of Immigration Policies – what a shock, huh?
http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?SectionID=1&ParentID=0&SectionTypeID=1&SectionTree=1
They align nearly perfectly which means that mainstream “Progressivism” in this country IS “Socialism” (yes I made you dig for it – read the PDF on the DSA website. Work for it so you believe it yourself, don’t take my word for it). Don’t kid yourself by thinking Progressivism is anything other than Socialism by another name. And neither group minds the affiliation – they just don’t want you to be too aware of it because “you are too stupid not to see it is the right way to go.” And you might be old enough to have had some actual non-revisionist history -- before the socialists took over Academia -- that correctly informed you of the many failed efforts at it and their horrific toll on humanity.
The DSA (Democratic Socialists) themselves do not view “Socialist” as a slanderous accusation – they are, in fact, proud of what they stand for. My only question is that since there are many countries in the world who match their view and only a few that don’t – why can’t they PLEASE go to one of them and leave the one alternative choice ALONE. I’m certain Cuba wouldn’t mind accepting them as an immigrant. Oh yeah, they don’t want to because Socialist countries aren’t nearly as nice or as free as the non-Socialist ones. Hmmm. Think there’s something to that?
So does anyone want to have a real DEBATE on the relative merits of Socialism vs Republican Governance? Oooh! Oooh! Can I start with the millions of humans killed by Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Il? Can I follow up with the millions enslaved in Europe for over 40 years who couldn’t wait to tear down a wall? Let’s talk about Nazi Germany (avowedly Socialist – anyone seen that word in any movies about Nazis?) How about Castro and Cuba – anyone want to debate Cuba before and after Castro? (before – vacation paradise, after – cesspool of a country) Can we talk about the economy before and after Barack Obama?
Let’s look at a present-day Socialist – John Holdren (Obama’s Science Czar). Here are his views on human life – he advocates forced sterilization, wants to put contraceptives IN THE WATER SECRETLY, believes children aren’t human beings until who-knows-when, and says that children are a net BURDEN to the world (as opposed to a precious gift from God). Think I’m making this up? It was in his own words, in a book authored by him – check it out here:
http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
And no, he has not repudiated his viewpoints and “grown” – he just waffles and lies a bit better when he gets asked uncomfortable questions about it. That, my friends, is what Socialism really is all about.
What is astounding is that this viewpoint has been mainstreamed due to the huge impact of George Soros – apparently you can buy and pay for an entire country for about $5B which is what he has spent. Why can’t we find some real Patriots to spend an equal amount taking it BACK! Here is more on Soros, the most dangerous man in the world and backer of the Progressive movement. (Note this article is written by a Navy Seal and member of MENSA – not exactly a wacko or ill-educated rube)
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14700
Check this out for the connections between the modern Progressive movement and Satanist, Aleister Crowley – you start with Crowley the Satanist – acknowledged as the founder of the phrase “New Age”, follow his disciples Alinsky (radicalism), Hefner (sexuality), Kinsey (warped views on human sexuality), Timothy Leary (drug use), and Soros (who put his money to work promoting the whole mess) and you have the end result – the Progressive movement in America and Barack Obama, it’s Socialist figurehead. Want to cement the connection? ‘Do what thou will shall be the whole of the law.’ – no, that’s not the mantra of Hollywood in 2010 or the Buster generation – it was the catch-phrase for Crowley’s seminal work. That just shows how entrenched the concept became – could have been said by Hefner, Alinsky, Obama, or Soros.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Journal/editorial.aspx?id=923348
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Journal/editorial.aspx?id=957204
Only people TRULY IGNORANT of history and clueless about human nature can possibly believe in Socialism as an ideology. At least Soros isn’t stupid – to him it’s just a tool for his own ego and power lust. He doesn’t believe for one moment that it does anything but enslave millions of human beings. Can I just end by calling this for what it is: Progressivism = Socialism = Humanism. And Humanism is the core sin (the Greeks called it Hubris) – the belief that MAN can be equal to GOD or that MAN CAN BE HIS OWN GOD. When you see the fear of global warming, or the social justice drive, or concern about overpopulation, or the need to control others “for their own good” what you see is MAN trying to do GOD’S job. And that is exactly why in this Republic formed on Christianity the founders equated FREEDOM with RELIANCE ON GOD. They got it right – people who trust God can live freely in the understanding that God is in control and that we do not have to try to control things so much. As soon as you break that link – in the interest of MORE so-called freedom – that freedom – to have sex when you want how you want, to own everything in sight, to tell others how to live, to take and scratch and steal and kill and destroy – becomes a poison. Hollywood had it right once – “with great power comes great responsibility” (Spider Man). Let’s leave the “great power” to a “great one”, GOD. And that means fighting Humanism in all its’ forms – including the masquerade of the Progressive Movement.
More on Socialism and it’s hold on our Congress – DO NOT VOTE FOR list (in my opinion)
http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/gov_philosophy/dsa_members.htm
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13696
http://sovereignty.net/center/socialists.htm
BDL
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)